Savagery, Power and Fear and How It Ties in with Lord of...

MLA Research Paper Savagery, Power And Fear And how it’s ties in with Lord Of The Flies Young children who are left unattended will slowly loose their civilization, which will turn into, Savagery, Power, and Fear. Civilization is when man meets his basic needs in a healthy manner. Savagery is when people revert back to their lost human instincts. Power, in the case of Lord Of the Flies it’s a position of ascendancy over others: AUTHORITY. Fear is an unpleasant often strong emotion caused by expectation or awareness of danger. Lord of the Flies shows a great amount of uncivilization through out the whole novel. Through all the characters for example when the boys create the Lord of The flies, which is â€Å"the bloody, severed†¦show more content†¦As the boys grow more savage, their belief in the beast grows stronger. By the end of the novel, the boys’ behavior is what brings the beast into existences, so the more savagely they act, the more real the beast seems to become. ( Sparknotes, Themes, Motifs and Symbols). Jack one of the young boys who were stranded on the island is very savage, for example when Jack cannot bare the thought of someone else telling his story about how he killed a pig, he begins, â€Å" we spread round. I crept. On hands and knees. The spears fell out because they hadn’t no barbs on. The pig ran away and made an awful noise- it turned back and ran into the circle, bleeding we closed in- I cut the pigs throat.† (Golding 79). Jack had reverted back to uncivilized ways because his civilization had been shattered because of being stranded on the island. Jack even gets the rest of the boys to join in dancing around the fire as they were cooking the meet from the pig they were saying â€Å" kill the pig. Cut her throat. Bash her in.†( Golding 79). Savagery can destroy civilization. It only takes one person to become uncivilized and the others will slowly follow after. But on the other hand is it only children who become savages when left unattended or can young people who have grown up in good neutering homes become savages, the answer is ‘yes’ according to an article called In Harms way, â€Å" One in three Canadian girls will experience a controlling, abusive datingShow MoreRelatedImportant Symbols in Lord of the Flies by William Golding676 Words   |  3 PagesGolding’s novel Lord of the Flies, he uses unique elements to symbolize many concepts throughout the story. The two most important but differing symbols used throughout the novel are the Conch and Sow’s head symbolically used by the author to demonstrate the transition of good to evil as the darkness of savagery slowly begins to powerfully overtake the boys’ mental concept of their civilian nature that they were born into. Both symbolically represent a certain importance and power to the boys as theyRead More Use of Symbolism in Goldings Lord of the Flies Essay1321 Words   |  6 PagesUse of Symbolism in Goldings Lord of the Flies Lord of the Flies, a suggestive name for the Devil, a devil whose name proposes that he is devoted to decay, destruction, demoralization and panic, exactly what William Golding had in mind when using symbolism in this novel. The Lord of the Flies (1954), is a novel in which interpretating the symbols are a main key to not only understanding, but also enjoying the novel. After tying many of the symbols together, you can figure out more about whatRead MoreComparative Analysis Of Brave New World And Lord Of The Flies 888 Words   |  4 PagesWorld and Lord of the Flies: Comparative Analysis on Archetypes Sometimes, societies cannot avoid sacrifice in order to thrive. Unfortunately, the purest individuals often make the sacrifices, not the deserving. Jesus Christ, a common archetype among literary characters, sacrificed himself for His community and people around Him. William Golding and Aldous Huxley’s contemporary dystopian novels reflect a similar theme through their use of archetypes. For instance, both Brave New World and Lord of theRead MoreLord of the Flies - Civilization vs Savagery2896 Words   |  12 Pageswhich it was capable. After the war, Golding resumed teaching and wrote his first novel, Lord of the Flies. Lord Of The Flies tells us the story of a handful of young schoolboys who had been marooned on an island as the plane that they were travelling, on to escape the war was shot down. The only survivors were the passengers, British schoolchildren between the ages of six and thirteen. It revolves around how the children cope without the structure of authority, civilization and the watchful eyeRead More How Golding Presents the Decline from Civilisation to Savagery in Lord of the Flies2816 Words   |  12 PagesHow Golding Presents the Decline from Civilisation to Savagery in Lord of the Flies Lord of the Flies is the name given to the inner beast, to which only Simon ever actually speaks. As Simons waits for the beasts arrival near the bloody sows head on the stake (buzzing with flies), The Lord of the Flies speaks to him, warning him not to get in its way or else he shall be killed by the boys. The Lord of the Flies name comes from the sows head and the countless flies buzzing about it, whichRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Lord Of The Flies1495 Words   |  6 Pagesan abundance of personal power and governs using authoritarian approaches. In the two novels, Animal Farm by George Orwell, and Lord of the Flies by William Golding, there is an evident portrayal of leadership at its worst. In Animal Farm, although the animals of Manor Farm dream of creating a perfect utopian world for themselves, after the expulsion of Mr. Jones transpires, the undemocratic ascension of Napoleon s dictatorship emerges. In the other novel, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, afterRead MoreScript For English Project Analysis1993 Words   |  8 Pageshave culminated in the general consensus that politically experienced figures are the best candidates for president. Yet here we are now with a businessman instead of the traditional politician, who promises to make America great again. So why and how is it that we have gotten to where we ar e now? Slide 1: Introduction Everyone: I’m Tangia, I’m Aaron...etc. Tangia: And we will be analyzing such patterns of tradition and change in literature. Sunny: By definition, tradition is the handing downRead MoreBelonging the Crucible, Lord of the Flies and Animal Farm3249 Words   |  13 Pageswealth, land, power)and corruption of power turns a town against each other and highlights the different groups in the town and how they are linked or exiled from the rest of the town and how better understanding of each group could effect this. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding the different views and beliefs of Ralph and Jack and the need for power in both boys’ segregates the group and the loss of innocence and humanity turns the group away from civilisation and towards Savagery. In GeorgeRead More Comparing Nature of Man in Island of Dr. Moreau and Lord of the Flies4645 Words   |  19 PagesNature of Man Exposed in Island of Dr. Moreau and Lord of the Flies  Ã‚        Ã‚   Throughout the natural history of mankind, the human race has always held a notion of its predominance over all other creations of nature. Man has long believed that he is somehow morally superior to all other creatures, motivated by a higher source than basic instincts. Yet, the history of man is marked by an interminable string of events that would seem to contradict that theory: war, genocide, segregation, suppressionRead MoreReview Of Charlotte Bronte s Jane Eyre 10879 Words   |  44 Pages[Brocklehurst], as a convent full of religieuses would worship their director† (145) St. John Rivers Religious â€Å"‘Yes, and deems, and is bound to deem, himself honoured by the lot, and aspires but after the day when the cross of separation from fleshly ties shall be laid on his shoulders, and when the Head of that Church militant of whose humblest members he is one, shall give the word, â€Å"Rise, follow Me!†...I hold that the more arid and unreclaimed the soil where the Christian labourer’s task of tillage

Why Was The Declaration Of Independence Written - 1089 Words

Why was the Declaration of Independence Written? Just like many other politically based holidays such Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Memorial Day, or Labor Day, the American people don’t really understand as a whole what the 4th of July really means or why the Declaration of Independence was adopted. There were true struggles that occurred during these times of oppression that jolted the revolution of America. Today’s America focuses on the liberties gained from it and the sole fact that the Declaration was signed on July 4th by future presidents, but do not know what caused it to be written or what was to be accomplished. Google Scholar The writing of the Declaration of Independence had many causes and reasons to be written. People of this century might not understand how the colonists of the 18th century felt. Today there are many laws and taxes put in place, so many that we can’t keep track, that it is only second nature to accept them. For the colonists, these were hard to accept and one by one kept building tension(resentment), as if each were a breath of air into a balloon before it popped. Carl Becker stated that the writing of the Declaration was, â€Å"Not to declare independence, but to proclaim to the world the reasons for declaring independence†(p. 5). It was intended to say that they had already had independence and that they had the same right of every free people; the natural rights of man. It was to centralize their political leader’s idealizations of unfairlyShow MoreRelatedThe Declaration Of Independence By The United States1106 Words   |  5 PagesThe setting of the Declaration of Independence was the United States. It was declared on July 4, 1776. After the Boston tea party rebellion the United states wanted their independence. One will describe why the declaration of independence was written. What lead to the cause for writing such a document. The leaders who wrote the declaration. And what the colony was going through for it to lead to the circumstances. One will look at how England was treating the colonies that made them want to be the irRead MoreInfluence Of The Declaration Of Independence711 Words   |  3 PagesThe Influence of the Declaration of Independence The Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson in 1776, influenced the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights which was later written by James Madison in 1787. The purpose of the Declaration of Independence was to declare independence from England and outline what rights they wanted and why they should have them because their voices and opinions were not being heard. The goal for the US Constitution was to ensure that the new governmentRead MoreImportance Of The Declaration Of Independence707 Words   |  3 PagesThe Declaration of Independence was written in 1776 and its purpose was to declare America colonies be free and independent from Great Britain, get other colonists on board, and to encourage other nations to help them withdraw from the British. The first draft was of Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson and then edit by Franklin and Adams and on July 4 the Declaration had been officially adopted by Committee of Five. In the draft Thoma s Jefferson was trying to break connectionsRead MoreSimilarities Between The Declaration Of Independence And The Declaration Of Independence948 Words   |  4 Pagesof time and have become statement pieces for our society. In this group, the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson and Common Sense by Thomas Paine both hold high positions. Thomas Paine wrote â€Å"The Crisis†, which was a chapter in his pamphlet Common Sense, which advocated that the thirteen original colonies gain independence from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence was a government document written in 1776 that proclaims America a state of democracy not connected to Britain.Read MoreThe Declaration Of Independence By Thomas Jefferson1113 Words   |  5 PagesStates Constitution, Declaration of Independence share many similarities and probably the same amount of differences. The Unites States Constitution was written on 17 September 1787 and the Declaration of Independence was written on 4 July 1776, the dates hold no significance at that time, but the Declaration was written first. This shows that out of the three the Declaration of Independence was written first, and with that being said was most important. Usually documents written and signed first becomesRead MoreThe Declaration Of Independence And Independence877 Words   |  4 PagesThe Declaration of Independence The Declaration of Independence is without a doubt one of the most important documents ever to be written in American history so far. It was signed by fifty-six different men, all who were representatives from different states. The person who wrote the Declaration of Independence is someone who we all know and grew up learning about, the famous Thomas Jefferson. The purpose of it was to declare the 13 colonies in America free and independent from Great Britain, getRead MoreThe Opinion Of The Declaration Of Independence880 Words   |  4 Pagesfreedom began with the signing of a very important document called the Declaration of Independence. In 1776, the Declaration of Independence was written by Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Benjamin Franklin, and signed by John Hancock. It was written in a time of turmoil between the 13 original colonies and Britain. It has three parts – the preamble, indictment and conclusion. The Declaration was writt en to provide a theoretical case for revolution, to list complaintsRead MoreCommon Sense And The Declaration Of Independence1517 Words   |  7 PagesCommon Sense and the Declaration of Independence are two very important documents in American history. Written by Thomas Paine, although not an official document, promotes thoughts that the citizens understood and needed, but did not know how to express their actions and ideas. The Declaration states the necessary reasons for independence in the colonies as well as the importance that their are equal rights. The Declaration announced to the world as a unanimous decision that the thirteen coloniesRead MoreThe s Belief That All Men1295 Words   |  6 PagesPublished on March 8, 1775, On African Slavery by Thomas Paine was available for the public ten months and two days before Common Sense. Despite the difference in publishing dates these two written works provide numerous similarities. For example, On African Slavery is addressed â⠂¬Å"To Americans:† (Paine 1) and Common Sense is similarly â€Å"Addressed to the Inhabitants of America† (1). Furthermore, both written works address Paine’s belief that all men are â€Å"originally equals† (71). In Common Sense, PaineRead MoreThomas Paine Common Sense Analysis1052 Words   |  5 PagesThe birth of a nation does not happen overnight nor with one word. One can clearly see how words and ideas have an impact on people’s thoughts and writing by examining â€Å"The Declaration of Independence† and Thomas Paine’s â€Å"Common Sense.† Basically, the two documents echo principles stated in John Locke’s â€Å"Second Treatise of Government,† and share a style of expressing their feelings on national issues; the authors examine and give reasons for colonial problems with the government and offer a solution

The Importance of Marriage in Pride and Prejudice Free Essays

Set in late 18th Century England, Pride and Prejudice depicts the search of women for the ‘inevitable’ husband and of a male dominant society, within which no woman can be considered truly successful without the assistance of a man of ‘good fortune’. Austen addresses the common ideals of society throughout Pride and Prejudice, such as the monetary values of marriage and the need of a woman to find security for herself and her future children. The opening line of the novel reads ‘It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife. We will write a custom essay sample on The Importance of Marriage in Pride and Prejudice or any similar topic only for you Order Now Austen not only uses this line to introduce a key theme of the novel, but also hints at the underlining themes of the novel and at the irony and satire due to follow. This is also a use of proleptic irony, Elizabeth is considered as a woman who seeks true love, rather than a marriage based on the fortune of the male; however, upon seeing Pemberley Austen presents Elizabeth as considering money for the first time, the sheer size of the house impresses her and thus she cannot disregard its appeal. During both the 18th and 19th centuries marriage was regarded both a social and biological destiny for woman across all the classes. Austen portrays this belief through Charlotte Lucas whom after gaining some composure considers â€Å"Without thinking highly either of men or of matrimony, marriage had always been her object; it was the only honourable provision for a well-educated young woman of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want† (Austen,J. 1853: 22). This amplifies the importance of the rejection of marriage by Elizabeth to Mr Collins, whom by the opinions of society at the time, the natural reaction for a woman in her situation would have been to accept. For she cannot afford to be overly choosy when it comes to marriage – earlier on in the novel Austen describes Mr Bennett cautiously going through the accounts of the estate, in which we are indirectly informed that the accounts are not looking positive. This marriage rejection is also relevant to the life of Austen, who we have learnt rejected a marriage proposal after overnight mentation. Marriage during the 18th and 19th centuries would be a whole family affair, and thus the effects of a marriage proposal or rejection would be felt throughout the generations. Families would look to ally themselves with other families of similar rank, hence marriage between cousins was common practice. This would ensure that both wealth and property would remain within the same family for generations via entailment, thus explaining the disappointment of Mrs Bennett upon finding out of the rejection of marriage between Elizabeth and Mr Collins. Moving to their husbands’ establishment would often be the only possible freedom available to girls, though not to be confused in any way with independence, which girls at the time would be lacking. This was another reason that leading families would ally with one another, or often marry within – a family would never wish for their daughter(s) to be associated with a family of lower social value, and thus a smaller estate, or require any future financial support from them – this dependence would grow increasingly expensive and as Austen presents the Bennetts as a family with some financial troubles there is no question as to why she identifies the need for the daughters to be married off. With marriage being the ultimate goal for any young girl within Pride and Prejudice, events leading up to any such event are considered significant. For example, any balls or dances and the partnerships which develop within these; any ‘chance’ encounters, such as meetings within town. Marriage would be a key theme of conversation within social circles of girls beyond puberty, the legal age for marriage was 16 (or the age of ‘coming out’), it was much desired by the age of 18 and would threaten to be beyond availability for girls of 20 or older. Girls would worry about being considered an ‘old maid’ beyond the age of 20 which explains the desire that Austen presents Charlotte to have in ‘catching’ Mr Collins and the warning that Mr Collins gives Elizabeth, who upon rejection of Mr Collins’ proposal is already 21. Though the legal age of marriage in England was 16, due to the Marriage Act of 1853, it is assumed that Lydia and Wickham elope to Gretna Green in order to complete their marriage, rather than be living in sin and thus have society look down on them as an unlawfully acquainted couple – in Scotland was not necessary to live in each others’ company for a minimum of 3 weeks prior to marriage like it was in England, thus allowing for an instant marriage. Much like the partnership between Darcy and Elizabeth we are made to wait for them to be partners in dance, it is a recurring theme throughout the novel that the longer the time period before the first dance between a couple the longer the time period will also be before they are romantically interested in one another. â€Å"To be fond of dancing was a certain step towards falling in love† (Austen, J. 1853: 6), thus the reluctance of Darcy to participate in dancing earlier on in the novel marks his limited social availability. However he becomes more available to Elizabeth later on in the novel as Austen presents him as someone whom is interested in being acquainted with Elizabeth and thus he asks her to dance, though even the act of doing this is portrayed as being difficult for him to achieve. The partnership between Elizabeth and Darcy is a stark contrast to that of Jane and Bingley, which Austen develops from the introduction of the two parties – they dance at the first meeting of one another and are thus romantically involved with one another from this point. Mr Bennett is presented by Austen as a man who is interested in the happiness of his daughters, though namely Lizzy, he is rarely phased by the actions of Lydia, Jane or Mrs Bennett however upon learning of Mr Collins’ proposal states â€Å"Your mother will never see you again if you do not marry Mr. Collins†¦ And I will never see you again if you do. † (Austen, J. 853: 64) Austen uses this conversation as a means of demonstrating the understanding and respect that exists between both Lizzy and her father, with Mrs Bennett already having come to the conclusion that Mr Bennett would insist on Lizzy marrying Mr Collins, however in this scene Austen also manages to portray a subtle humour – we read earlier on in the novel of Mrs Bennett’s ‘nerves’ and this is just another example of Mr Bennett knowing how to vex her, with the reader remembering earlier on in the book when Mr Bennett states â€Å"You mistake me, my dear. I have a high respec t for your nerves. They are my old friends. I have heard you mention them with consideration these last twenty years at least. † (Austen, J. 1853: 4). With Lizzy being truly her father’s daughter she knows that she will have the support of the parent who means the most to her, or at least the parent whom she is more interested in pleasing. Mr Bennett plays a pivotal role in the marriage of Lizzy, he has the final say on whether or not she marries Darcy, throughout the novel Austen doesn’t portray any form of interaction between Mr Bennett and any of his other daughters or their respective partners regarding the issue of marriage. Though this may be due to Elizabeth’s importance to the novel, we assume that this is also due to the value of her partnership with Darcy and how this is used to show her romantic development throughout the novel. Austen presents Elizabeth as a character who goes through the typically romantic process of falling in love with someone – both Elizabeth and Darcy must overcome a variety of obstacles in order for their love to Blossom, their story starts with bad first impressions of one another, with Lizzy assuming Darcy to be a pompous, arrogant man and Darcy being blinded by Lizzy’s social inferiority. Austen wrote this novel based in an era within which girls being forced in to marriages for financial reasons was coming to an end and though monetary reasons were still considered a valid reason for marriage, or at least one for which marriage would be considered acceptable by one’s family, people were also marrying due to love for one another. Lizzy represents the new era within which love is the main reason for marriage or courtship, we recognise this as Lizzy is aware of Darcy’s fortune from an early stage of the novel, however she dismisses him due to his arrogant behaviour – if Lizzy was only interested in his wealth, or if this were the reason of her interest in Darcy then Austen would have ensured that she, like her other sisters, flaunted herself in front of a male of such high social value. Austen represents marriage for the ‘wrong’ reasons with the marriage between Mr and Mrs Bennett. With Mr Bennett having previously married Mrs Bennett for her youth and good looks, with Mrs Bennett declaring â€Å"I certainly have had my share of beauty, but I do not pretend to be anything extraordinary now. â€Å", he now finds his only happiness through private study or mocking his wife, referring to her ‘nerves’ as his ‘old friends’, with his witty humour being too complex for her to understand and thus not being able to tell when he is using sarcasm. This sarcasm is a trait which Lizzy shares, for example in Chapter 28 when describing Miss De Bourgh, Lizzy states â€Å"She looks sickly and cross. Yes, she will do for him very well. She will make him a very proper wife. † This use of juxtaposition is rife in Austen’s work and is often used for comic effect. Austen uses the juxtaposed relationship between Lizzy and Darcy to present us with an example of marrying for love, rather than superficial reasons which are evident throughout the novel. Examples such as Mr Collins and Charlotte Lucas, or Lydia and Wickham are doomed to fail, or at least to result in the severe unhappiness of the parties involved due to the basis of the relationships being built on financial security or social status. Lizzy and Darcy represent a marriage which ignores the superficial values and focuses on true love, Austen shows us as the reader that this is the only way to have a truly successful and happy marriage to one another and she manages to gain our agreement by portraying the other possible choices throughout the novel. How to cite The Importance of Marriage in Pride and Prejudice, Papers

WHY WAS RICHARD III OVERTHROWN Essay Example For Students

WHY WAS RICHARD III OVERTHROWN? Essay WHY WASRICHARD III OVERTHROWN?Richard III reigned for two years, twomonths and one day. His reign was over run my rumour and even tothis day people see Richard as a tyrant. One of the rumours thatplagued Richard throughout his reign, was that he had murdered his twoyoung nephews. (one of which was Edward V, who succeeded to the throneimmediately after the death of Edward IV). Even in the days of Richardsreign, murdering children was seen as an appalling thing to do and whetherRichard did kill his nephews or not, it did not matter the general publicdid not trust Richard. Richards position was made worse, becausethe previous king (Edward IV) had left conflicting instructions as to whoshould rule the country after he had died. Richard was killedin combat, at the Battle of Bosworth. It could be argued that Richardwas responsible for his own demise and indeed his own death. The obvious key factor in Richard beingoverthrown is the fact that he was killed in battle, some historians saythat it was Richards own bold and soldier-like personality that got himkilled. Richard lost the Battle of Bosworth because of a number ofdifferent factors. One very important element was that Richard managedto alienate a great majority of nobles from the south of England. Whilst Edward IV had been king Richard had been left to run the north ofEngland, in this time he was able to establish a power base for himself,and acquired the himself the title Lord of the North. This processbegan in 1471 where Richard obtained Neville Lordships in Yorkshire andCumberland, and when he married Anne Neville, which gave him the loyaltyof Warwicks men. The relationship between the northern gentry andRichard was strengthened further when Edward IV entrusted Richard and hisnorthern counterparts to the war against Scotland. When Richard becameking he invited northern nobles and gentry to the south of England to ruleover the southern counties. This quite clearly upset and angereda lot of the nobles from the south. However Richard did not rewardall the northern nobility accordingly the Earl of Northumberland expecteda lot of power in the north, after he had helped so much in Richards accessionto the throne. However, Northumberland was left of the council ofNorth., this in t urn led Northumberland withdrawing his aid for Richardat the Battle of Bosworth. Richard also killed a number of noble men fromthe north and south without trial. With so many nobles feeling angrytowards Richard, it would be incredibly difficult to gain support and menfor his army at the Battle of Bosworth. Richards actions would alsotempt many nobles to side with Henry Tudor, which would result in Richardsdissolution. Richards had many problems to resolvewith France. Problems dating back to 1340 (to recover or extend territoriesin France). When Richard came to the throne he launched attacks onBreton shipping for piracy, although it would seem Richard was allowingthese attacks, because the Bretons were keeping Edward Woodville as a refugee. Another more important refugee was in France though, Henry Tudor. Tudor was taking shelter in Brittany. The King of France used Tudorto try and blackmail Richard into sending him archers, Richard did notcomply with his requests. The conflict between Richard and the Kingof France was very unfavourable to Richard, as France would not releaseTudor. Richard needed to get hold of Tudor, to crush his attemptto overthrow him, (Tudor had put in an official claim for the throne onDecember 25th 1483 in Brittany) it could be argued that if Richardhad been able to get hold of Tudor and imprisoned or even killed Tudor,he may not have been overthrown. However Richard did not concentrateon this issue enough. Richards encounter with France was headingtowards a war, which inevitably meant that Scotland would begin to starttrying to attack England. .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .postImageUrl , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:hover , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:visited , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:active { border:0!important; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:active , .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0518ce979e806caf7986cab6bc1df29d:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Symbology in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight EssayIt would seem that Richard III was a veryunpopular man with the general public, English nobility and foreign nobility. He lacked trust between himself and the people he needed to be able trustthe most. It would seem that Richard relied heavily upon the loyaltyof other nobles instead of using his own men, nobility that quite possiblydid not trust him, and therefore were likely to change sides, to a leaderwho could offer them more favourable opportunities. However withany subject concerning Richard III it is difficult to assess the situationas his entire reign is shrouded in mystery, rumours. Even so evidencethat is available does tend to show that Richard did not do enough to gainsupport from other nobles, until it was too late (as when he tried to reconcilehis problems with southern nobility before the Battle of Bosworth) andhe did not realise the severe threat henry Tudor was to the crown.